Part VIII: Syllable Weight and Resolution

When we talk about lifts, just about everything that affects the perceived strength of a syllable matters. Even alliteration can be described as a way to add emphasis to the lifts in a half-line. For this reason, the structure of the syllable also matters.

In English (and other stress-based languages) there is a very strong connection between stress and the structure of syllables. A simple way to illustrate the fact is to take a long word like confidentiality and break it up into syllables:

      con   fi   den  ti  al  i   ty

Three syllables are closed (i.e., they end with a consonant): con, den, and al; four syllables are open (i.e., they end at the vowel): fi, ti, i, and ty. It is no accident that the three closed syllables are more strongly stressed than the open syllables. The "heavier" a syllable is (i.e., the more there is in the syllable after the vowel) the more prominent it seems, and the more likely it is to attract stress.

We can set up a scale, from the lightest to the heaviest types of syllables, as follows:

(lightest)


1. Open syllables (syllables ending in a simple vowel): pa, huh.
2. Open syllables with a diphthong (historically, long vowels and diphthongs): boy, how.
3. Closed syllables (syllables ending with a single consonant): hat, bag.
4. Heavy syllables: syllables ending with diphthong plus consonant or more than one consonant: house, noise, horse, bold, band, bank
(heaviest)

Given the way English works, there is a very strong tendency for lifts to be heavy (or at least closed) syllables. And there are some special things that happen with stressed, open syllables. Consider the following examples:

     He is a big man.
     He is a little man.

The word little consists of a stressed, open syllable followed by an unstressed syllable. And it practically trips off the tongue: rhythmically, it takes about the same amount of time to say "big man" as it does to say "little man".

What this means is that rhythmically, we can treat words like little or sudden as the equivalent of a single heavy syllable. Take a pair of hypothetical half lines like the following:

     one who lives by the sword
     will meet swift death

Notice how the lifts are all closed or heavy syllables: lives, sword, swift, death. But in terms of Anglo-Saxon alliterative meter, the following pair of half lines are rhythmically equivalent:

     one who lives as a savage
     will meet sudden death

In short, a lift doesn't have to be a single syllable. It can also be a two-syllable combination like sudden or savage, where the first syllable is open and stressed, and the second syllable is unstressed.

This is called resolution since the pair of syllables are resolved or treated as if they were a single heavy syllable.

In Anglo-Saxon, where there was a distinction between long and short syllables, long syllables could not be resolved; long vowels behaved just like diphthongs. In modern English, the notion of vowel length doesn't make any sense (though syllable heaviness does.) So it's a practical question whether resolution is a real phenomenon in modern English.

In my own writing of alliterative poetry, I started without any sense that resolution was possible, but over time I have begun to feel its effects, and have gradually concluded that resolution is a real rhythmic pattern. Sequences like savage, sudden, little ... these seem to have a special rhythmic quality. But we can wait till we analyse real examples of alliterative poetry to worry about it. For now, we should simply add the concepts of heavy syllable and resolution to our list of concepts. Both will be useful later.

Back: What Makes a Strong Stress?
Next: Secondary Stress; Strong and Weak Dips

Copyright ©2000, Paul Deane